- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 17:45:28 +0900
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
Hi there. This is the first [Summary] message. Fortunately it's not intended to re-state the scope of this list, which has been well respected so far, congratulations to all. Unless it proves itself useless, or annoying, we'll try to issue such [Summary] messages every once in a while, to summarize discussion (can be useful for new participants) and the main points stated, focus on some topics, and eventually prepare deliverables. This is the first [Summary] message, so it will be special. Instead of proposing you a summary and/or orientations (which I shall do later), I'll simply ask "what next?". This should be a thrilling question, but it could be our nemesis : excluding "intro" messages (very useful and interesting to find out what are the context, goals and expectations for each of us), a few book promotion, and a call for review of a document under work, we already had a few rounds of discussions. Some of them hold their own value, others will be wasted time (or mere re-doing the world again and again) if they're not followed by action, or turned into "real" documents. Here are, therefore, a few proposed deliverables for this group. These deliverables can be done and hosted here (i.e W3C), or elsewhere (newborn maccaws group[1] comes to mind, but there are many other site gathering such documents), not a problem as long as (John Colby told this very well) we parallelize but don't step on each others' toes. **************** First, lists. I must say I don't fancy lists : they're hard to maintain up-to-date, hard to make really objective - not just advertisement -, etc. Plus, we're at W3C, with vendor neutrality as a core principle, that could make it trickier... Lists ideas which have been floating in the air: - standard compliant "big" websites - web standards books and reviews [2] - "resources", standards evangelism websites We could also, and that's an orientation I deem worthwile, turn our discussion into "white-paper" style documents. reading through the discussion threads, I see a few candidates already (I shall prepare summaries of those threads later): - WYSIWYG or multi-platform, why standards can help achieve both - metrics and cost/benefits business cases - defining metrics (framework) - cost/benefits of using valid HTML - cost/benefit of using CSS for style - others? - answering misconceptions about web standards (Karl Dubost from W3C QA, in an article to be released, answers, with a systematic yet not pedantic approach, a few misconceptions; this could/should be extended) Third idea is to contact and educate people. - contact and educate web agencies (We - W3C QA - are already working on a "what you should propose to your clients" note) - contact and educate companies (We - W3C QA - are already working on a "what you should ask your web design agency/web department) - contact and educate teachers and the education world - contact and educate governments But for all of those, again, we need more than good will and enthusiasm to convince, we need material, resources, proofs, figures. This may be yet another good thing to work on here. **************** I suggest we pick a few work orientations among those, and try to focus on them and try to produce tangible bits out of our discussions. [1] http://www.maccaws.org/ [2] http://www.maccaws.com/wiki/?page=BooksList Yours, Olivier -- Olivier Thereaux - W3C http://www.w3.org/People/olivier | http://yoda.zoy.org
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 04:45:30 UTC