- From: Al Abut <aabut@biomail.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:31:35 -0700
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
At 02:23 PM 7/18/2002 -0700, Joseph McLean wrote: >Edited by our fellow list-mate Molly Holzschlag (hi Molly!), "Usability: >The Site Speaks for Itself" is a real-world exploration of some big name, >big audience sites... > >I haven't read it yet (just ordered), but the reviews are universally >five-star. I'm such a schmuck... I have that book, it rocks and I totally devoured it recently! I guess it slipped my mind because I was thinking of books on web standards and not usability, although the two obviously have some overlapping areas. I would love to read a web standards book with that format: lots of working examples, not just theory; interviews with the creators, hearing about their trials and tribulations. Also, I totally agree with Molly's approach to hear the site goals from the horse's mouth, not from marketing execs or third-party usability guns-for-hire, and that's also the strength of the Joe Shepter and Curt Cloninger books, albeit with a more artistic bent. After all, what's more interesting - listening to some museum tour guide drone on and on about pieces they didn't create, or having a conversation with the artist and listening to their inspirations, goals and thoughts? Well, depends on the artist, but personally, I'd rather take my chances with them. I guess the first step would be to get a gallery of interesting standards-compliant websites, along the lines of the Minimalist Web Project: http://www.textbased.com/~minimalist/ Ok, another little rant here about the term HTMinimaList - it seems to have very different meanings to people and a bit of clarification is in order. I read an article discussing the difference between the styles of simple-and-easy-to-use and minimalist-and-not-so-easy-to-use sites (sorry, forgot the link! Anyone know?) and how both styles are often lumped under HTMinimaList, but there's a third category that I think is woefully overlooked: the style of sites that are bandwidth-friendly, have minimal amounts of HTML and still manage to look good. Too many sites are a bloated mess with regards to file-size, yet are lumped under the terms of "simple" and "minimalist" just because of the UI. There's a reason why the HTMinimaList chapter in Curt's book discussed not only the clean designs of 37signals, but the efforts of the 5K design competition ( the5k.org ) to get developers to think creatively about bandwidth limitations. Whew! Am I getting on anyone's nerves yet? I'll keep trying... Al Abut
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 18:31:47 UTC