- From: Thor Larholm <public-evangelist-w3@jscript.dk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:59:21 +0200
- To: <Mike.Steckel@SEMATECH.Org>, <public-evangelist@w3.org>, <list@webdesign-L.com>
Short and simple: If you want Netscape 4.X support, you do not want standards. The Hacks'R'Us department is somewhere else. I apologize if that sounds crude, but welcome to the real world. Either you want standards (with a small degree of customizations) or you do not want standards and you can keep on using TABLE/FONT/IMG-spacer-based layouts. Give up Netscape 4 or give up standards. Thor Larholm <URL: http://www.jibbering.com/faq/> FAQ for comp.lang.javascript <URL: http://jscript.dk/unpatched/> Unpatched IE vulnerabilities ----- Original Message ----- From: <Mike.Steckel@SEMATECH.Org> To: <public-evangelist@w3.org>; <list@webdesign-L.com> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:18 PM Subject: CSS and Netscape > > We are in the process of redesigning a multiple company extranet and have > learned that a huge number of our users have Netscape 4.X as their browser. > Consequently, some of our team is reluctant to design using standards (the main > concern is using CSS) since it will mess up the design we have already created. > The concerns include CSS becoming overhead and that keeping track of how the > various workarounds for Netscape 4.x work and don't work, along with the > inheritance issues, will take a huge amount of time. I would love to know what > some of our options are, but don't have the technical expertise to make a strong > case. Any advice? > >
Received on Friday, 30 August 2002 04:58:45 UTC