- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:44:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- cc: Esw <public-esw@w3.org>
Hi Danny, the vocabulary stuff you are looking at sounds like it is extending the thread vocabulary produced for Annotea (or for that matter the original Annotea vocabulary of annotation types) to allow for discussion threads to be tracked. This seems to me like a good idea. http://www.w3.org/2001/03/thread The ability to provide user-friendly interfaces for this (such as the icon-selection that Amaya has for marking different types of annotation - see the help file at http://www.w3.org/Amaya/User/attaching_annotations/configuring_icons) is a promising paralell for the use of graphic RDF editors (IdeaGraph, IsaViz, RDFAuthor, etc) cheers Chaals On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Danny Ayers wrote: > >I didn't realise Semantic Blogging was being followed up as an e-sw case >study, until I found the link on the new blog... > >Anyhow, one of the apps I've been working on for my Ideagraph project is >semantic blogging and to help with this I've started writing up a vocabulary >(RDFS) for 'Issue-Based Information Systems', the idea being to use terms >like 'Argument', 'Question', 'pro', 'con' within blog (and other) discussion >threads. > >http://purl.org/ibis > >Very much a work in progress, suggestions welcome. > >Cheers, >Danny. > >----------- > >http://dannyayers.com > >"The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne." - Chaucer > > > -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22 Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Saturday, 18 January 2003 16:44:56 UTC