- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 07:22:17 -0400
- To: "Dickinson, Ian J" <Ian.Dickinson@hp.com>
- Cc: "'Libby Miller'" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, public-esw@w3.org
* Dickinson, Ian J <Ian.Dickinson@hp.com> [2003-04-25 12:12+0100] > > From: Libby Miller [mailto:Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk] > > Do people have a preference for one style over the other? > > Could you let us know today if possible? We need to specify > > the map as soon as possible in order to get postcards printed for www2003. > Can't say I'm particularly grabbed by either of them, but if you have to > pick one I'd go for the map, not the globe. Is there any reason it has to > be geographically accurate? Perhaps a schematic, analogous to the London > Underground map of London, would allow you to convey the sense of spatial > distribution without getting hung up on the scale problem. Of course, you > may not consider that a helpful suggestion given the short timescale :-) One advantage of being geographically accurate is it simplifies our lives when we try to plot SW researchers, groups, events etc on the map... I prefer the map to the globe, fwiw. Dan
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 07:22:24 UTC