- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 13:51:32 +0100
- To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- cc: public-esw@w3.org
>>>Libby Miller said: > I think the intention of this deliverable is ambigious: > > [[ > Month 5: (10.2: scalable_rdbms_mapping_report) Public report on mapping > data from RDBMS. This > will describe current best practice on using existing RDBMS > or other storage systems for general > Semantic Web data. (2 months, report, Pub.) > ]] > > 'mapping from' seems rather different to 'mapping to', i.e. you could > have existing data in RDBMS and map it to RDF, or you could be storing > general RDF in RDBMS. This deliverable seems to cover both. Do we think > this is the case? I think it should :) I wrote it to be flexible and indeed wanted to and from them in the scope. Jan and I have started sketching notes in the draft area. It also can cover "other storage systems" that are not RDBMSes. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 08:53:52 UTC