- From: Helmut Nagy <helmut.nagy@semantic-web.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:55:36 +0100
- To: Manolis Peponakis <manolis.peponakis@gmail.com>
- Cc: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGNDXz+r2YDiXPKV-z4m+-C2_ygi-=n0WLj9y7zys=xSMR21tw@mail.gmail.com>
Interesting, thanks for the pointer! - SKOS concepts are OWL individuals; - SKOS does not take a stance on whether it must also be possible to treat SKOS concepts as OWL classes; - The restrictions on OWL-DL prevent treating SKOS concepts as OWL classes; - *There is an expectation that an ongoing OWL revision will alleviate the latter problem by offering some form of metamodeling* Does anyone have knowledge about the expected OWL revision? Kind Regards Helmut Helmut Nagy COO, Strategic Product Manager [image: https://mailtasticcdn.azureedge.net/img/images/siglinks/company/02438aa4-230f-43f1-af08-455e9aa5a989/u_logo-OtFrszV7rQ.png] <https://cGlFX04.na1.hs-sales-engage.com/Ctc/GD+23284/cGlFX04/Jks2-6qcW69sMD-6lZ3kHW4WMFk16F3zjfW73h4Ks79q3jlW8Y4Hhh12NJnsW49BGth5RqwTvW86JBPw5CJqxxN84VXSGw3rBlW2BPDzF57zHHrW1_04tR23LRw5N7zLdlsMGvvFW5Qch2C7FVb7hW7gwCbt3zR5MZW8K-ZPR7kKRKQW68Nr7t1Ky73GW8GTbnW8Gp0CXW5gvQq84dglJWW9hw5fT7snqJwW7FVHdX3p7QpYW9fPwxn8zK6nzVs3ZkF5ZdRB6W89d_Pf7k4qY4f376MyF04> [image: Aktuell können Sie einige Informationen nicht sehen. Bitte aktivieren Sie externe Inhalte, um die Mail vollständig angezeigt zu bekommen oder klicken Sie hier.] <https://cGlFX04.na1.hs-sales-engage.com/Ctc/GD+23284/cGlFX04/JlF2-6qcW8wLKSR6lZ3l4W97RWF36f3dTBW6Zd5w224q6RCN4KLYMkkB3vVW4blMJL1QMnQ5W40h7LR7GW_f2W3wvqFJ2CY6VfW64T7c4370YbDW5r8nQ31QpRY5W6Qvz_B1sjgM7N40qbFXTwBpmW7kbKWQ8ll9TYW3cyvWQ561y6TN1yFDp0cfmhZW62f55G468mBlW2xltBW4NKz8zW1Xchkk5LFlQmW7dkvKZ6Df2zKW2cwh6x8458NYW8h2fYv1jCKWpW5WwSpy3Jp2RRW4G_B8Y632rJ8W6CSK6l8BDrXNW781Tzh60L_SdW2p7Mlh7v7nHJW1cz_VY2C5NR3W6215TZ1xWb59W2Q4dT599HRK0W7JHTfd67B01bf6fq0P404> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:51 PM Manolis Peponakis < manolis.peponakis@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Helmut and all > > Maybe it's my fault but I think there is a misunderstanding. The notion of > skos:Concept is an owl:Class but each skos:Concept (i.e. the education, the > trains, etc) is an OWL instance. And in OWL-DL the sets of classes and > instances are disjoint. > > Documentation -and some solutions on implementing OWL classes in SKOS- > could be found on section “5.2 SKOS Concepts and OWL Classes” of the SKOS > Primer available at https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secskosowl > > Kind Regards > > Manolis > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 11:28, Helmut Nagy <helmut.nagy@semantic-web.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Renato, >> >> according to the SKOS: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/skos.rdf >> >> A skos:Concept is a owl:Class >> >> <rdf:Description rdf:about="#Concept"> >> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Concept</rdfs:label> >> <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core"/> >> <skos:definition xml:lang="en">An idea or notion; a unit of >> thought.</skos:definition> >> <!-- S1 --> >> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class"/> >> </rdf:Description> >> >> Verstehe ich etwas falsch? Das sollte doch die Frage klären. >> >> Kind Regards >> Helmut >> >> Helmut Nagy >> >> COO, Strategic Product Manager >> >> [image: >> https://mailtasticcdn.azureedge.net/img/images/siglinks/company/02438aa4-230f-43f1-af08-455e9aa5a989/u_logo-OtFrszV7rQ.png] >> <https://cGlFX04.na1.hs-sales-engage.com/Ctc/GD+23284/cGlFX04/Jks2-6qcW69sMD-6lZ3nKW14BPZk1qdRTJN3qQmvcN9dnkW2WyXcj7wx3fNW8JH1LK3K_2BgW30BDNJ6shyj4W3dyvRv7W69GtW1tgcbm5zycmYW5Sc_jN1HTD2FW2HDGtD7kZdf1W5bnDzn4HXdQ-W5JSBH96hDxwsW30PkwY57H2v5W5JlXKq2RT9JTVPKT-C1GWKzGW62p6N24PXnRpW5WMxxr7Lkcq5W2lZ2g12ZWpkHW6rcKXG4W4_gkW5gYXH14T9NlLVjwdg74bYNXQf8q3wl004> >> >> [image: Aktuell können Sie einige Informationen nicht sehen. Bitte >> aktivieren Sie externe Inhalte, um die Mail vollständig angezeigt zu >> bekommen oder klicken Sie hier.] >> <https://cGlFX04..na1.hs-sales-engage.com/Ctc/GD+23284/cGlFX04/JlF2-6qcW8wLKSR6lZ3npW7MFDgw2Nz4R5W7qz46S2W0SKBW6N2Dvj8dDYflW4P1yfM7TQGB8W8LTCMq2wjCJRW7qM4dR77pFKtW1mGkXK2Tp3K1W6KDcHN9hzf9gVfcc8b3WFCW5N4rP_QfRHLksW12pjlh3jZtx6W73Q2mQ95RZnKW7l0hB91d5CYZVLL2w483GHkVN6vwk7cN5fTwW5843tL5mLnBtW1ygRm84GvgK2VHwhT434Zj6FW2qTs7j5JRcSVW2k2_Nc6ZThJ1W3TGBd750WPBQW1qgF0n7WJrzqW6qHCwX14K6bhW7mB3MY7rhWczW47WHRR8cBWlyW8KfT-s2gHd21W3R90g73zb3gxW2M10CV6JW2k3f6WDwsd04> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:13 AM Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, I have a question (that I hope you have not covered before …if >>> so…please send the archive links…) >>> >>> Having developed a number of SKOS vocabs over the years (across >>> different domains) I am constantly faced with the challenge of developing a >>> “vocabulary” that supports both the SKOS model (ie terms are instances of >>> skos:Concept) and terms that are also owl:Classes - to enable standard >>> inferencing. >>> >>> Here is a simple example: >>> >>> vocab:SmokingVariety a skos:ConceptScheme, owl:Class ; >>> rdfs:subClassOf vocab:Vocabulary ; >>> skos:prefLabel "Smoking Variety"@en-uk . >>> >>> vocab:cigarette a skos:Concept, owl:Class ; >>> skos:prefLabel "Cigarette"@en-uk ; >>> skos:definition "Processed tobacco, manufactured into >>> cylinder made of paper."@en-uk ; >>> rdfs:subClassOf vocab:SmokingVariety ; >>> skos:topConceptOf vocab:SmokingVariety . >>> >>> >>> Are there any best-practices in this context? >>> >>> Thanks… >>> >>> Renato >>> >>> >>> >>>
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2024 11:55:54 UTC