W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > February 2017

RE: Using iso-thes to publish 1:n-relations between skos:Concepts from different concept schemes

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:55:28 +0000
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
CC: "public-esw-thes@w3.org" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D2BEB46@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
Hello Antoine,

On Monday, February 20, 2017 3:55 PM, Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] wrote:

> >> I guess the decision on using MADS/RDF also depends on how the 'groupings' of
> >> concepts can be seen as 'real' SKOS concepts rather than ad-hoc, application-
> specific
> >> combination. In a way, this is a bit a case of pre-coordination vs post-coordination.
> In
> >> the MACS case MADS is a rather good fit as it's about headings which are largely
> >> designed for being combined.
> >
> > That's an excellent criterion! If the vocabularies are post-coordinated, you can use
> madsrdf, if they are pre-coordinated, you shouldn't.
> 
> 
> Er isn't it the other way round? MADS was made for LCSH...

Then I don't quite understand your comment... Can you expand a bit on what you meant?

Cheers,

Lars
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2017 13:56:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:46:52 UTC