W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > February 2017

XKOS

From: Fabio Ricci <fabio.ricci@semweb.ch>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:31:40 +0100
Message-Id: <BCD8B130-D4C7-4459-BEC0-4DEE7C53C900@semweb.ch>
Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Dear community

could anybody here give me some hints where is de-facto using XKOS and where some well-done examples of XKOS files can be found?


Kind regards / Meilleures salutations / Freundliche Grüsse 
Fabio Ricci
semweb		
Semantic Web Technologies · Records Management
Software systems · ICT coaching · ICT Projects leading	
https://semweb.ch <https://ch.semweb.ch/>	
https://skosshuttle.ch <https://skosshuttle.ch/>	
https://rdflink.ch <https://rdflink.ch/>	
Weinmanngasse 26 
CH-8700 Küsnacht ZH (Switzerland)

Tel.

+41 (076) 5281961 
+39 (389) 0681334

Skype:

semweb-llc <applewebdata://78CC6EC8-EA6A-4C27-BB1A-A532F5715C66/%E2%80%9C#%E2%80%9D>
Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipients, are confidential and maybe privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email, and delete this message and any attachments from your system. Thank you.


> On 16 Feb 2017, at 01:37, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hello Lars,
> 
> Sorry for the delay answering this email.
> 
> You are right in your understanding of ISO-THES' CompoundEquivalence is rather between terms/labels and concepts.
> 
> MADS/RDF may have something better, with madsrdf:ComplexType and madsrdf:componentList
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/mads/rdf/
> 
> But perhaps the closest thing available is the XKOS pattern for correspondences:
> http://www.ddialliance.org/Specification/XKOS/1.0/OWL/xkos.html#correspondences
> 
> (in fact I've delayed this mail because I wanted to review XKOS)
> 
> I'm not sure it does all you need, though. XKOS doesn't have 'typed correspondences' of the form of 'OR' and 'AND' combinations, which were identified as a requirement in the SKOS context.
> The names they use are also not so great. See
> https://github.com/linked-statistics/xkos/issues/31
> 
> Best,
> 
> Antoine
> 
> On 25/01/17 16:47, Svensson, Lars wrote:
>> Dear SKOS-Community,
>> 
>> Here in the DNB we're currently revisiting how we publish our thesaurus mappings in RDF with a focus on how to publish 1:n-relations (i. e. where a concept in one KOS is mapped to two or more concepts in another KOS). We don't publish those relations yet since we haven't found a best practice. I've been looking at madsrdf which sort-of-works and last week I delved into iso-thes which has CompoundEquivalence which looks like a good starting point. However, if I understand the documentation correctly CompoundEquivalence can only be used between _terms_ (within one KOS?) and not between _skos:Concepts_.
>> 
>> I'm aware that this is an old discussion [1] and probably not resolved yet. However, any insight you can provide would be most helpful!
>> 
>> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2011Jun/0007.html and subsequent messages...
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Lars
>> 
>> *** Lesen. Hören. Wissen. Deutsche Nationalbibliothek ***
>> 
> 


Received on Friday, 17 February 2017 09:32:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:46:52 UTC