- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:45:10 +0000
- To: <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2A7346E8D9F62D4CA8D78387173A054A5FF88161@exmbx04-cdc.nexus.csiro.au>
... and also Temporal Hierarchical Ordinal Reference System ontology http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_thors.html I understand the the W3C TIme ontology is likely to be revived as a consequence of the W3C/OGC Linking Geospatial Data workshop held at Google London last month - http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html#tandyBarCamp Simon Cox | Research Scientist CSIRO Land and Water PO Box 56, Highett Vic 3190, Australia Tel +61 3 9252 6342<tel:%2B61%203%209252%206342> | Mob +61 403 302 672<tel:%2B61%20403%20302%20672> simon.cox@csiro.au<mailto:simon.cox@csiro.au> | http://csiro.au/people/SimonCox ________________________________ From: Bernard Vatant [bernard.vatant@mondeca.com] Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2014 7:33 PM To: SKOS Subject: Re: TGN place types (broader/narrower spanning ConceptSchemes) Richard FWIW what we have gathered so far in Linked Open Vocabularies regarding Time and Events is at http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabularySpace_Events.html http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabularySpace_Time.html I have to add the new resources Osma has put in my radar in this conversation (SAPO, Change and maybe more). The standardization of time/event/change ontology issue has been pending for years, without any substantial progress despite its importance. The W3C Time Ontolgy has been stuck at draft stage since ... 2006. See http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/ I tried as while ago to gather interested people in the framewaork of the LOV community, we had a first online meeting in December 2012 [1] but unfortunately there was no real follow-up. [1] https://plus.google.com/events/c4fbo6525gpvv55pdqrscf5km7c 2014-04-01 10:12 GMT+02:00 Osma Suominen <osma.suominen@helsinki.fi<mailto:osma.suominen@helsinki.fi>>: On 01/04/14 10:58, Richard Light wrote: Yes, I'd agree with that approach too. What would be /really/ helpful for end-users would be if the various historically-aware place authorities (SAPO, TGN, Pelagios, PastPlace, ...) all used the /same /ontological structure to express statements about places in time. Possibly something CIDOC CRM-based? You are right, of course. I'll cc Tomi as a hint of this thread. He is responsible for the modeling in SAPO. (Tomi, full archives are here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/ - unfortunately you need to check both March and April) -Osma -- Osma Suominen D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist National Library of Finland P.O. Box 26 (Teollisuuskatu 23) 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO Tel. +358 50 3199529<tel:%2B358%2050%203199529> osma.suominen@helsinki.fi<mailto:osma.suominen@helsinki.fi> http://www.nationallibrary.fi -- Bernard Vatant Vocabularies & Data Engineering Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 Skype : bernard.vatant http://google.com/+BernardVatant -------------------------------------------------------- Mondeca 35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris www.mondeca.com<http://www.mondeca.com/> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews<http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews> ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2014 21:45:55 UTC