W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > April 2014

RE: TGN place types (broader/narrower spanning ConceptSchemes)

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:45:10 +0000
To: <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2A7346E8D9F62D4CA8D78387173A054A5FF88161@exmbx04-cdc.nexus.csiro.au>
... and also Temporal Hierarchical Ordinal Reference System ontology http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_thors.html



I understand the the W3C TIme ontology is likely to be revived as a consequence of the W3C/OGC Linking Geospatial Data workshop held at Google London last month -

http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html#tandyBarCamp



Simon Cox | Research Scientist
CSIRO Land and Water
PO Box 56, Highett Vic 3190, Australia
Tel +61 3 9252 6342<tel:%2B61%203%209252%206342> | Mob +61 403 302 672<tel:%2B61%20403%20302%20672>
simon.cox@csiro.au<mailto:simon.cox@csiro.au> | http://csiro.au/people/SimonCox

________________________________
From: Bernard Vatant [bernard.vatant@mondeca.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2014 7:33 PM
To: SKOS
Subject: Re: TGN place types (broader/narrower spanning ConceptSchemes)

Richard

FWIW what we have gathered so far in Linked Open Vocabularies regarding Time and Events is at
http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabularySpace_Events.html
http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabularySpace_Time.html

I have to add the new resources Osma has put in my radar in this conversation (SAPO, Change and maybe more).
The standardization of time/event/change ontology issue has been pending for years, without any substantial progress despite its importance.
The W3C Time Ontolgy has been stuck at draft stage since ... 2006. See  http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/
I tried as while ago to gather interested people in the framewaork of the LOV community, we had a first online meeting in December 2012 [1] but unfortunately there was no real follow-up.

[1] https://plus.google.com/events/c4fbo6525gpvv55pdqrscf5km7c


2014-04-01 10:12 GMT+02:00 Osma Suominen <osma.suominen@helsinki.fi<mailto:osma.suominen@helsinki.fi>>:
On 01/04/14 10:58, Richard Light wrote:

Yes, I'd agree with that approach too.  What would be /really/ helpful

for end-users would be if the various historically-aware place
authorities (SAPO, TGN, Pelagios, PastPlace, ...) all used the /same
/ontological structure to express statements about places in time.
Possibly something CIDOC CRM-based?

You are right, of course. I'll cc Tomi as a hint of this thread. He is responsible for the modeling in SAPO.

(Tomi, full archives are here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/ - unfortunately you need to check both March and April)

-Osma


--
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Teollisuuskatu 23)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529<tel:%2B358%2050%203199529>
osma.suominen@helsinki.fi<mailto:osma.suominen@helsinki.fi>
http://www.nationallibrary.fi




--
Bernard Vatant
Vocabularies & Data Engineering
Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
Skype : bernard.vatant
http://google.com/+BernardVatant
--------------------------------------------------------
Mondeca
35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris
www.mondeca.com<http://www.mondeca.com/>
Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews<http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2014 21:45:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:46:36 UTC