W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > September 2013

RE: Comparing versions of SKOS terminologies

From: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:55:56 +0300
To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01c501ceadea$6b1d7c10$41587430$@alexiev@ontotext.com>
> I like the differentiation between delta and history

Yes. 
And this could be attached to various KOS entities: Concepts, Labels (in various languages), Notes and Definitions (in various languages), Relations (semantic or mapping relations).

Examples of revision history actions for Concepts may include: create, update, delete, undelete, merge...
Examples of editorial workflow actions for Concepts may include: propose, accept, reject, publish...
Actions for relations may include add, delete, update (e.g. move a concept in the hierarchy)...

In addition to Delta and History, two other Provenance aspects are:
- basic DCT information: created, modified, issued, valid...
- Sources and contributors of a KOS entity

Has anyone researched approaches for standardizing the above? I'd first look at PROV...

Best regards! Vladimir
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 05:56:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:46:26 UTC