- From: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:55:56 +0300
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> I like the differentiation between delta and history Yes. And this could be attached to various KOS entities: Concepts, Labels (in various languages), Notes and Definitions (in various languages), Relations (semantic or mapping relations). Examples of revision history actions for Concepts may include: create, update, delete, undelete, merge... Examples of editorial workflow actions for Concepts may include: propose, accept, reject, publish... Actions for relations may include add, delete, update (e.g. move a concept in the hierarchy)... In addition to Delta and History, two other Provenance aspects are: - basic DCT information: created, modified, issued, valid... - Sources and contributors of a KOS entity Has anyone researched approaches for standardizing the above? I'd first look at PROV... Best regards! Vladimir
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 05:56:36 UTC