W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > September 2013

Question: What is Best Practice for a Catalog of ConceptScheme mapping

From: Johan De Smedt <johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 13:22:39 +0200
To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, "'Linked Data community'" <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <010c01cea7ce$bc6d14d0$35473e70$@tenforce.com>
Hi,

 

Good Concept Scheme mappings are valuable assets that may be put in a linked data catalog.

What is the best practice to do this?

 

I have considered VoID (http://vocab.deri.ie/void) as one of the vocabularies allowing to express the relationship(s) between the mapped concept schemes and the used mapping property.

In the illustration below

- The mapping is a Linkset (and a dataset) http://myDScatalog/ConceptSchemeMapping/AgroVoc-EuroVoc

- The linkset characterized by the linking properties (linkPredicate) skos:exactMatch and skos:closeMatch.

- The mapped skos:ConceptScheme are detailed by datasets in my Dataset catalog.

- The dataset description can use (multiple) void:vocabulary properties to indicate the dataset can be processed using any of the following RDF schema

   - http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core

   - http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos-xl

   - http://eurovoc.europa.eu/schema

- The linkset identifies the mapped dataset using void:subjectsTarget and the void:objectsTarget

   (though the distinction between source and subject is less relevant in the given example – because the link predicates listed are symmetric)

 

 



 

Thanks for advice.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Johan De Smedt 

Chief Technology Officer

 

mail:  <mailto:johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com> johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com

mobile: +32 477 475934

mail-TenForce

 


image002.png
(image/png attachment: image002.png)

image003.jpg
(image/jpeg attachment: image003.jpg)

Received on Monday, 2 September 2013 11:23:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:46:26 UTC