- From: François-Paul Servant <francois-paul.servant@noos.fr>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:25:38 +0100
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi, people seem to agree to keep SKOS concepts and "real world things" (such as those identified by dbPedia URIs) in separate spaces: dbPedia:Michelle_Obama is not a skos:Concept. What property should be used to link a SKOS concept to the corresponding "real world thing"? One suggestion in the thread is to use umbel:linksEntity. Is there agreement on a given property? Are SKOS concepts to be considered as "Non Information Resource"? (and must we therefore use 303-redirect for SKOS concepts identified by slash URIs?) The word "concept" seems to imply that they are. But: <quote>skos:Concept is basically a "library business object", likely to bear properties such as Dublin Core (created, modified, creator, publisher)</quote>. It looks like they are not very different from a document: are there reasons to distinguish between a SKOS concept and the web page about it? Thanks, fps
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 12:26:01 UTC