- From: Thomas Bandholtz <thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:33:06 +0200
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi Antoine, my use case is data integration. Dataset A has defined concept scheme (or collection or subclass) a:cities as a value set. Dataset B has defined concept scheme (or collection or subclass) b:areas as a value set. Now I want to have some agent X to query both (and further) datasets. I want a query builder where users can pick cross-dataset search conditions from a list. To support this, X defines a concept scheme x:location which is the set union of a:cities and b:area. Each concept in x:location will have skos:inScheme a:cities and/or b:area, sure. The set of referred concept schemes can be inferred from this. But I would like to describe the intention in one explicit statement. This is why I am looking for a mapping relation between such subsets of concepts. Best regards, Thomas Am 22.08.2012 21:15, schrieb Antoine Isaac: > (3) > I'm not sure I get the question. If they exist, such mapping > properties could be very difficult to semantically define. Would a > concept scheme be broader, equivalent, narrower than another one? > Rather, I'd say that the property you're after indicates that some > concepts from these two concept schemes are connected. For this I > think one could use general linkage properties between datasets, such > as voiD's linksets [2]. -- Thomas Bandholtz Principal Consultant innoQ Deutschland GmbH Krischerstr. 100, D-40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany http://www.innoq.com thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com +49 178 4049387 http://innoq.com/de/themen/linked-data (German) https://github.com/innoq/iqvoc/wiki/Linked-Data (English)
Received on Monday, 27 August 2012 10:33:31 UTC