- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:21:52 +0800
- To: <a.blumauer@semantic-web.at>, <christophe.dupriez@destin.be>
- CC: <holger@topquadrant.com>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5D27281509882544A841804E4EBA914C310FCA8534@EXWA-MBX01.nexus.csiro.au>
No progress on the W3C wiki so I started some local experiments. See https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/wiki/Siss/VocabularyService3 These could probably be merged. Comments welcome. From: Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company) [mailto:a.blumauer@semantic-web.at] Sent: Tuesday, 28 June 2011 5:45 PM To: Christophe Dupriez Cc: Cox, Simon (CESRE, Kensington); holger@topquadrant.com; public-esw-thes@w3.org Subject: Re: Results of survey "Do controlled vocabularies matter?" Hi Christophe, thank you for this first step, we should also consider to make references to http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/ maybe also ask the people who work on this if they would like to participate in our specific SKOS related initiative. Anyone else (who provides SKOS tools) interested? Regards, Andreas ________________________________ Von: "Christophe Dupriez" <christophe.dupriez@destin.be> An: "Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company)" <a.blumauer@semantic-web.at> CC: "Simon Cox" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, holger@topquadrant.com, public-esw-thes@w3.org Gesendet: Montag, 27. Juni 2011 23:49:00 Betreff: Re: Results of survey "Do controlled vocabularies matter?" Hi Andreas, For you and all people interested, I created the following page in the SKOS wiki: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/SKOS_Repository_REST_http_API No specs for the moment but I will base my contribution on the model of the DSpace REST API: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/REST+API Have a nice evening! Christophe Le 27/06/2011 14:06, Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company) a écrit : Hi Christophe, this is great, and I agree that we should stick to SKOS terminology. Regards, Andreas ________________________________ Von: "Christophe Dupriez" <christophe.dupriez@destin.be><mailto:christophe.dupriez@destin.be> An: "Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company)" <a.blumauer@semantic-web.at><mailto:a.blumauer@semantic-web.at> CC: "Simon Cox" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au><mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, holger@topquadrant.com<mailto:holger@topquadrant.com>, public-esw-thes@w3.org<mailto:public-esw-thes@w3.org> Gesendet: Montag, 27. Juni 2011 10:43:41 Betreff: Re: Results of survey "Do controlled vocabularies matter?" Hi Andreas, I am definitively willing to implement this kind of "shortcuts" in ASKOSI.org We must then also standardize the structured result formats (RDF, JSON : SparQL results? Which columns are included in the result?) ... and respect REST API principles ... I would also prefer to avoid "all" and stick to SKOS terminology: http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/semweb/131/narrower Have a nice day! Christophe Le 27/06/2011 10:19, Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company) a écrit : > Same with PoolParty Thesaurus Management [1]: > We provide "stored procedures" and can offer a variety of pre-defined SPARQL queries, > which can execute queries mentioned by Simon. > > But this is not enough: If developers could execute at any SPARQL endpoint, e.g. [2] > queries like > > http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/PoolParty/sparql/semweb/allConceptSchemes > > or for any given concept, e.g. [3] > > queries like > > http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/semweb/131/allNarrowers > http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/semweb/131/allRelateds/prefLabel="foo" > > in a STANDARDIZED way, then developers don´t have to care about anymore > if the underlying technology is PoolParty, TopBraid or something else AND > they don´t have to learn Sparql but rather could concentrate on a vocabulary´s inherent scheme& logic, > > and exactly this is necessary to get things going also for non-SemWebber in my opinion. > > If anyone is interested in defining such queries, please let me know! > > Cheers, > Andreas > > [1] http://poolparty.punkt.at/ > [2] http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/PoolParty/sparql/semweb > [3] http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/semweb/131 > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > >> Von: "Simon Cox"<Simon.Cox@csiro.au><mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au> >> An: holger@topquadrant.com<mailto:holger@topquadrant.com>, public-esw-thes@w3.org<mailto:public-esw-thes@w3.org> >> Gesendet: Montag, 27. Juni 2011 04:49:38 >> Betreff: RE: Results of survey "Do controlled vocabularies matter?" >> E.g. >> 1. Get concept (all triples with concept as subject or object - >> DESCRIBE) with prefLabel = “foo” >> 2. Get concept with prefLabel in Fonglish = “foo” >> 3. Get concept http://example.org/bar and all narrower concepts >> 4. Get concept http://example.org/bar and all broader concepts >> 5. Get concept with prefLabel in Fonglish = “foo” and all narrower >> concepts >> 6. Etc ... >> i.e. pre-rolled queries which use the SKOS properties. >> Reusable SPARQL queries might be part of a solution. >> From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org<mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org> >> [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Holger >> Knublauch >> Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 9:11 AM >> To: public-esw-thes@w3.org<mailto:public-esw-thes@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: Results of survey "Do controlled vocabularies matter?" >> What aspects of SPARQL would such a standard layer include? We and >> our customers are heavily using SPARQL in the context of SKOS, and >> we have published a SPARQL-based constraint checking library [1] >> using the W3C Member Submission SPIN [2]. This will validate the >> various SKOS-specific integrity constraints and has been integrated >> with TopQuadrant's Enterprise Vocabulary Net (EVN) solution [3]. >> SPIN also makes it easy to encapsulate reusable SPARQL queries into >> so-called templates. These templates are basically parameterized >> queries that have a URI and arguments. Compare to stored procedures >> in SQL. It would be straight-forward to build and publish such a >> template library for SKOS, if someone here has a list of queries >> that they like to ask repeatedly. >> Cheers, >> Holger >> [1] http://topbraid.org/spin/skosspin >> [2] http://spinrdf.org/ >> [3] http://www.topquadrant.com/solutions/ent_vocab_net.html >> On Jun 27, 2011, at 10:34 AM,< Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>> wrote: >> “ a "standard" layer encapsulating Sparql especially designed for >> SKOS based systems >> might help in this situation. ” >> +1 >> From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org<mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org> >> [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andreas >> Blumauer (Semantic Web Company) >> Sent: Sunday, 26 June 2011 4:36 PM >> To: public-esw-thes@w3.org<mailto:public-esw-thes@w3.org> >> Subject: Results of survey "Do controlled vocabularies matter?" >> Hello all, >> we are happy to announce that the results of the survey titled >> "Do controlled vocabularies matter?" are available now. >> A short write-up and also the link to the report can be found here: >> http://blog.semantic-web.at/2011/06/26/thesaurus-based-search-engines-will-become-main-stream-in-the-near-future/ >> The report itself was published on issuu: >> http://issuu.com/andreas_blumauer/docs/survey_do_controlled_vocabularies_matter_2011_june >> We would be happy to receive comments from the community on this. >> As an interesting outcome it can be stated, that people working on >> controlled vocabularies >> seem to have put aside scepticism about the semantic web finally. >> On the other side the whole semantic web cake has not been digested >> yet: >> E.g. only a few people from the vocab-community deal with Sparql, >> which brings me to the conclusion >> that a "standard" layer encapsulating Sparql especially designed for >> SKOS based systems >> might help in this situation. >> Any activities going on in this area? >> Best wishes, >> Andreas >> ** Semantic Search Online Demo: http://bit.ly/semantic_search >> ** LOD2 - Creating Knowledge out of Interlinked Data - >> http://lod2.eu/ >> | Andreas Blumauer, Managing Director >> | Semantic Web Company GmbH >> | Lerchenfelder Guertel 43/5 >> | A - 1160 Wien, Austria >> | Tel +43 1 402 12 35 27 >> | Mob +43 676 9 234 16 2 >> COMPANY INFORMATION >> | http://www.semantic-web.at/ | http://www.i-semantics.at/ | >> | http://blog.semantic-web.at/ >> PERSONAL INFORMATION >> | mailto:a.blumauer@semantic-web.at | skype:blumauerpunkt | Blog: >> | http://ablvienna.wordpress.com > >
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 06:22:37 UTC