W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Ordering concepts in a Tree display

From: Jakob Voss <jakob.voss@gbv.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:47:40 +0100
Message-ID: <4D3D4ABC.8090800@gbv.de>
CC: public-esw-thes@w3.org
On 20.01.2011 18:57, Christophe Dupriez wrote:

> Do you think we need a Collation definition if we have an optional
> sortKey property? The collating process may be more a question of
 > process than one of data?

With a Collacation ontology you could define and share the process that 
dynamically calculates your sortKey. But sure we can start with a simple 
sortKey property and later add best-practice methods how to generate it. 
I am not fully comfortable with having it as property of the concept, 
but the triple-model of RDF does not let us do better without 
reification. Whe should only agree on:

1. The URI of the sortKey property
2. The domain of the property (literal with integer datatype?)
3. Whether a resource can have more than one sortKey (similar to 
http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#S14 for prefLabel).


Jakob Vo▀ <jakob.voss@gbv.de>, skype: nichtich
Verbundzentrale des GBV (VZG) / Common Library Network
Platz der Goettinger Sieben 1, 37073 G÷ttingen, Germany
+49 (0)551 39-10242, http://www.gbv.de
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 09:48:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:46:06 UTC