Re: Quality Criteria for SKOS vocabularies

Thanks for sharing these, Christian! It sounds like a great project.

Along with each criterion, it would be helpful to clearly indicate whether it should be increased or decreased to improve the quality.

e.g. instead of "Concept Redundancy" I would expect: "minimal concept redundancy" as a principle/criterion.

-Jodi

On 8 Apr 2011, at 16:18, Christian Mader wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In the course of my PhD project at the University of Vienna I'm going to address the question how to programmatically support collaborative creation of "good-quality" SKOS vocabularies. I have found 14 criteria that, in my opinion, could be used to assess the quality of said vocabularies. It would be really helpful for me to get some community input on these criteria, so I published them here:
> 
> https://github.com/cmader/qSKOS/wiki/Quality-Criteria-for-SKOS-Vocabularies
> 
> Please feel free to post your comments and suggestions regarding that matter, every kind of input will be warmly appreciated.
> 
> Best,
> Christian
> 
> -- 
> Research Group Multimedia Information Systems
> Department of Distributed and Multimedia Systems
> Faculty of Computer Science
> University of Vienna
> 
> Postal Address: Liebiggasse 4/3-4, 1010 Vienna, Austria
> Phone: +43 1 4277 39623, Fax: +43 1 4277 39649
> E-Mail: christian.mader@univie.ac.at
> 
>

Received on Monday, 11 April 2011 21:04:59 UTC