W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > November 2009

Best practices: representing homonym relationships in SKOS

From: Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:05:38 -0800
Message-ID: <3b6ad71c0911130905rcbec63fj33ad25275d05c90f@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Apologies if you've seen this on the LOD or SW lists, but it is
probably better posed to this audience: is there any best practice or,
failing that, good ideas for representing homonymy in SKOS? Best I can
come up with is subclassing skos:semanticRelation with something like
skos:homonym, and letting the client sort out which of the lexical
labels might be involved. Not excited about the need to go to a class
representation for labels; even less interested in anything involving
RDF collections. - cheers, BPA

Bradley P. Allen
+1 310 951 4300
Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 17:06:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:45:59 UTC