- From: Aida Slavic <aida@acorweb.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:00:03 +0000
- To: 'SKOS' <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi,
With respect to Cristophe info about management data and Leonard's
comment it
may be interesting to share experience from UDC
LexicalValue String 1 The wording of the term
identifier String 1 A unique identifier for the term
created date 0..1 The date when the term was created
modified date 0..1 The date when the term was last modified
source String 0..1 The person(s) or document(s) from which the
term was taken
Status String 0..1 Indication of whether the term is candidate,
approved, etc.
lang language 0..1 A code showing the language of the term. This
should be
included if the thesaurus supports more than
one language
On a top of these above we have the following data:
- 'modified' is a block of elements containing info about: date, person,
source, elements(fields) modified
- notation history
- used for (if the same notation was used in the past to denote an
other class/concept)
- replaces (if the same concept/class was in the past presented by
some other notation)
- cancellation data - linked to the Status :
date; person; source
replaced by - links to a new notation which replaces this one which
is cancelled (if applicable)
- class number type: simple or pre-composed
If number is pre-composed (pre-coordinated) then the string is
entered in a separate field in a coded fashion - each
code identifies the type of facet from which single classification
numbers comes (place, time, form,... or another subject)
With respect of pre-composed numbers, typically classification will
also have to have data such as as "derived from" - and "instructions
for derivations/divisions"
You will get a better idea about this from 76x Number building block
from MARC 21 Format Concise Classification
http://www.loc.gov/marc/classification/eccdhome.html
(NB! that this format is created mainly with Library of Congress
Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification requirements in mind).
'Derived from' is a special kind of relationships that classification
schemes are likely to have as, for instance, notation for English
literature or for English people or Linguistics of English language have
notation derived from from the notation for English language. This is
typical for most of documentary classifications.
I do not propose any of the above to be part of SKOS or ISO - this is
mainly in response to Leonard's note about missing elements with respect
to classification.
rgds
Aida
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4575 (20091105) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2009 12:00:38 UTC