- From: Aida Slavic <aida@acorweb.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:00:03 +0000
- To: 'SKOS' <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi, With respect to Cristophe info about management data and Leonard's comment it may be interesting to share experience from UDC LexicalValue String 1 The wording of the term identifier String 1 A unique identifier for the term created date 0..1 The date when the term was created modified date 0..1 The date when the term was last modified source String 0..1 The person(s) or document(s) from which the term was taken Status String 0..1 Indication of whether the term is candidate, approved, etc. lang language 0..1 A code showing the language of the term. This should be included if the thesaurus supports more than one language On a top of these above we have the following data: - 'modified' is a block of elements containing info about: date, person, source, elements(fields) modified - notation history - used for (if the same notation was used in the past to denote an other class/concept) - replaces (if the same concept/class was in the past presented by some other notation) - cancellation data - linked to the Status : date; person; source replaced by - links to a new notation which replaces this one which is cancelled (if applicable) - class number type: simple or pre-composed If number is pre-composed (pre-coordinated) then the string is entered in a separate field in a coded fashion - each code identifies the type of facet from which single classification numbers comes (place, time, form,... or another subject) With respect of pre-composed numbers, typically classification will also have to have data such as as "derived from" - and "instructions for derivations/divisions" You will get a better idea about this from 76x Number building block from MARC 21 Format Concise Classification http://www.loc.gov/marc/classification/eccdhome.html (NB! that this format is created mainly with Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification requirements in mind). 'Derived from' is a special kind of relationships that classification schemes are likely to have as, for instance, notation for English literature or for English people or Linguistics of English language have notation derived from from the notation for English language. This is typical for most of documentary classifications. I do not propose any of the above to be part of SKOS or ISO - this is mainly in response to Leonard's note about missing elements with respect to classification. rgds Aida __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4575 (20091105) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2009 12:00:38 UTC