- From: Sini, Margherita (KCEW) <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:56:54 +0200
- To: De Smedt Johan <Johan.DeSmedt@wkb.be>, Rob Tice <rob.tice@k-int.com>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
(sorry corrected mistake)
If a concept is reused across different concept schemes my proposal
would be to have different namespace (and so different URI) for it and then
define them with the different labels as needed, and then use mappings.
E.g.
uri c_in_a = http://myschemeA#c123 <http://myschemea/#c123>
and has preferred label a
uri c_in_b = http://myschemeB#c123 <http://myschemeB#c123>
and has preferred label b
http://myschemeA#c123 <http://myschemea/#c123> exactMatch
http://myschemeB#c123 <http://myschemeB#c123>
Hope this helps.
-----Or iginal Message-----
From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org on behalf of De Smedt
Johan
Sent: Mon 9/29/2008 09:48
To: Rob Tice; public-esw-thes@w3.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: furthed SKOS question
Hi Rob,
In our projects we have recognized the need to have different
labels
depending on the product/audience where a concept is used.
To solve that, we using mapping relationships.
Each product further uses only one specific Concept scheme
but can
exploit mapped concepts
- when clear for the audience (to navigate/use a different
thesaurus
- find indexed/classified documents (classification by the
other concept
scheme terms)
Currently we have found the skos mappings to be responding to
different
requirements though than what we need (at least as I
understand it and I
appologize up front if I am wrong). So we use a proprietary
mapping
construct (it was introduced on this mailing lists in other
comments I
made).
We also tried some label-relationship approach but this
became too
complicated in maintenance, conformance to the standard,
clarity and
complexity.
I am looking forward to your or other reactions and
approaches about
this issue.
kr, Johan De Smedt.
e-mail: johan.de-smedt@tenfroce.com
===================
-----Original Message-----
From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rob Tice
Sent: Monday, 29 September, 2008 09:12
To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Subject: furthed SKOS question
Dear list members
As a follow up to my previous post (but in a slightly
different area)
If a concept is reused across different concept schemes.
How should we expose that scheme 'a' has a preferred label
for the
concept of 'a', but scheme 'b' has a preferred label for
concept 'a'
which is actually 'b'?
Best Regards
Rob
------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Tice, Director
Knowledge Integration Ltd
35 Paradise Street
Sheffield
South Yorkshire
S3 8PZ
email: rob.tice@k-int.com
Tel: +44 (0)870 803 4661
http://www.k-int.com <http://www.k-int.com/>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.4/1695 - Release
Date:
27/09/2008
13:11
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 08:57:40 UTC