- From: Sini, Margherita (KCEW) <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:56:54 +0200
- To: De Smedt Johan <Johan.DeSmedt@wkb.be>, Rob Tice <rob.tice@k-int.com>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
(sorry corrected mistake) If a concept is reused across different concept schemes my proposal would be to have different namespace (and so different URI) for it and then define them with the different labels as needed, and then use mappings. E.g. uri c_in_a = http://myschemeA#c123 <http://myschemea/#c123> and has preferred label a uri c_in_b = http://myschemeB#c123 <http://myschemeB#c123> and has preferred label b http://myschemeA#c123 <http://myschemea/#c123> exactMatch http://myschemeB#c123 <http://myschemeB#c123> Hope this helps. -----Or iginal Message----- From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org on behalf of De Smedt Johan Sent: Mon 9/29/2008 09:48 To: Rob Tice; public-esw-thes@w3.org Cc: Subject: RE: furthed SKOS question Hi Rob, In our projects we have recognized the need to have different labels depending on the product/audience where a concept is used. To solve that, we using mapping relationships. Each product further uses only one specific Concept scheme but can exploit mapped concepts - when clear for the audience (to navigate/use a different thesaurus - find indexed/classified documents (classification by the other concept scheme terms) Currently we have found the skos mappings to be responding to different requirements though than what we need (at least as I understand it and I appologize up front if I am wrong). So we use a proprietary mapping construct (it was introduced on this mailing lists in other comments I made). We also tried some label-relationship approach but this became too complicated in maintenance, conformance to the standard, clarity and complexity. I am looking forward to your or other reactions and approaches about this issue. kr, Johan De Smedt. e-mail: johan.de-smedt@tenfroce.com =================== -----Original Message----- From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rob Tice Sent: Monday, 29 September, 2008 09:12 To: public-esw-thes@w3.org Subject: furthed SKOS question Dear list members As a follow up to my previous post (but in a slightly different area) If a concept is reused across different concept schemes. How should we expose that scheme 'a' has a preferred label for the concept of 'a', but scheme 'b' has a preferred label for concept 'a' which is actually 'b'? Best Regards Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------ Rob Tice, Director Knowledge Integration Ltd 35 Paradise Street Sheffield South Yorkshire S3 8PZ email: rob.tice@k-int.com Tel: +44 (0)870 803 4661 http://www.k-int.com <http://www.k-int.com/> No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.4/1695 - Release Date: 27/09/2008 13:11
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 08:57:40 UTC