- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:32:17 +0200
- To: SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Just realized something I find a bit weird To begin with skos:mappingRelation and skos:semanticRelation seem to have somehow distinct usages, the former being used for cross-vocabulary relations, and the latter for relations inside a vocabulary. But since skos:broadMatch has became a subproperty of skos:broader, it is de facto a subproperty of skos:semanticRelation. Same for skos:narrowMatch and skos:relatedMatch. Some mapping relations are now semantic relations, and I have no problem with that ... But why are poor skos:closeMatch ans skos:exactMatch excluded from the promotion? Seems to me, there is as much "semantics" in a close or exact match than in broad, narrow and related match(es). Why not make simply skos:mappingRelation a subproperty of skos:semanticRelation ? Bernard -- *Bernard Vatant *Senior Consultant Vocabulary & Data Engineering Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> ---------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** *3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com> Blog: Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/> ----------------------------------------------------**
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:44:41 UTC