- From: Thomas Bandholtz <thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:07:09 +0200
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- CC: SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi Bernard, 2008/05/skos is not downwards compatible with 2004/02/skos! E.g.skos:subject is discontinued, and there is no class TopConcept any more. So you shouldn't just change a namespace without considering the need of further changes in structure, if you want to do so. I'm not really sure about "any solid reason for such a change", I only see this has not been guided by a wise versioning policy :-) This raises the question if we would need some guidelines for Ontology governance. Anyway, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core# still is a cool uri! You don't have to change anything. Best, Thomas Bernard Vatant schrieb: > > Hi all > > Reading through the latest draft dated 9 June 2008 at > http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/ > The SKOS namespace URI is now http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos#, > whereas in the previous versions it was > http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core# > The latter has been used extensively by applications and published > vocabularies, which will have to be changed to be conformant to the > new namespace. > Was there any solid reason for such a change? > > Thanks! > > Bernard > > -- Thomas Bandholtz, thomas.bandholtz@innoq.com, http://www.innoq.com innoQ Deutschland GmbH, Halskestr. 17, D-40880 Ratingen, Germany Phone: +49 228 9288490 Mobile: +49 178 4049387 Fax: +49 2102 77160-1
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2008 06:07:45 UTC