- From: Leonard Will <L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:33:52 +0100
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Two further thoughts on what I have just written: 1. "broaderDirect" or just "broader" would not be a specific case of "broaderIndirect", in the way that "broaderParent" would be a specific case of "broaderAncestor". Does this matter? 2. By using terms such as ancestor / parent / child / descendant we avoid the problem that SKOS wishes to use "broader / narrower" in a loose way so as to accommodate thesauri which have not been constructed with correct BT/NT relationships in accordance with standards and ontological principles. It will also be important to use expressions other than "broader / narrower" if SKOS is extended to cover classification schemes, where lower-level classes are often combinations of concepts rather than specific subsets of the concepts under which they occur. Leonard Will -- Willpower Information (Partners: Dr Leonard D Will, Sheena E Will) Information Management Consultants Tel: +44 (0)20 8372 0092 27 Calshot Way, Enfield, Middlesex EN2 7BQ, UK. Fax: +44 (0)870 051 7276 L.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk Sheena.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk ---------------- <URL:http://www.willpowerinfo.co.uk/> -----------------
Received on Sunday, 8 June 2008 11:34:34 UTC