- From: Alasdair Gray <agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:03:09 +0000
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi,
With regard to the latest skos reference working draft, how should
mappings between vocabularies that involve collections be performed?
In the astronomy vocabularies that I have been working with, I have come
across several instances where I either need to directly relate 2
collections or a collection with a concept. One such example is for
relating the vocabulary of astronomy and astrophysics journal keywords
(A&A) [1] with the international astronomical union thesaurus (IAUT)
[2]. Below are brief snippets of the two vocabularies.
A&A
Concept: "Sources as function of wavelength"
NT Collection: "Gamma Rays"
NT Concept: "Gamma ray bursts"
Concept: "Gamma ray observations"
Concept: "Gamma ray theory"
IAUT
Concept: "Radiation"
NT Concept: "Gamma rays"
I would like to assert
A&A:"Gamma Rays" skos:exactMatch IAUT:"Gamma rays"
In fact, as I have typed up this example I wonder if the A&A vocabulary
snippet I have given is in fact valid in the new skos reference as is
declares a collection to be a narrower term and this goes against the
domain and range declarations for the BT/NT relationships.
Cheers,
Alasdair
[1]
http://www.aanda.org/index2.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=170&Itemid=191
[2] http://msowww.anu.edu.au/library/thesaurus/english/
--
Dr Alasdair J G Gray
http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~agray/
Explicator project http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk/
Office: F161
Tel: +44 141 330 6292
Postal: Computing Science,
17 Lilybank Gardens,
University of Glasgow,
Glasgow,
G12 8QQ, UK.
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 10:02:40 UTC