- From: Alasdair Gray <agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:03:09 +0000
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi, With regard to the latest skos reference working draft, how should mappings between vocabularies that involve collections be performed? In the astronomy vocabularies that I have been working with, I have come across several instances where I either need to directly relate 2 collections or a collection with a concept. One such example is for relating the vocabulary of astronomy and astrophysics journal keywords (A&A) [1] with the international astronomical union thesaurus (IAUT) [2]. Below are brief snippets of the two vocabularies. A&A Concept: "Sources as function of wavelength" NT Collection: "Gamma Rays" NT Concept: "Gamma ray bursts" Concept: "Gamma ray observations" Concept: "Gamma ray theory" IAUT Concept: "Radiation" NT Concept: "Gamma rays" I would like to assert A&A:"Gamma Rays" skos:exactMatch IAUT:"Gamma rays" In fact, as I have typed up this example I wonder if the A&A vocabulary snippet I have given is in fact valid in the new skos reference as is declares a collection to be a narrower term and this goes against the domain and range declarations for the BT/NT relationships. Cheers, Alasdair [1] http://www.aanda.org/index2.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=170&Itemid=191 [2] http://msowww.anu.edu.au/library/thesaurus/english/ -- Dr Alasdair J G Gray http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~agray/ Explicator project http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk/ Office: F161 Tel: +44 141 330 6292 Postal: Computing Science, 17 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 10:02:40 UTC