- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:06:23 +0100
- To: "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Guus asked me to suggest an issue to open at the next telecon. I suggest: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33 Cheers, Alistair. -- Alistair Miles Research Associate CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of SWD Issue Tracker > Sent: 26 March 2007 12:58 > To: public-swd-wg@w3.org > Subject: ISSUE-33: GroupingConstructs > > > > ISSUE-33: GroupingConstructs > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33 > > Raised by: Alistair Miles > On product: SKOS > > Thesaurus standards describe the use of "node labels" for convenient > grouping > and display. Many thesauri use node labels in this way. Some thesauri > use "guide > terms" for a similar purpose. In some social tagging systems, tags can > be > grouped into "bundles". > > The current vocabulary support in SKOS (called "Collections") for these > kinds of > grouping construct is broken, in that it introduces a contradiction into > the > SKOS specifications. > > See further information at: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/GroupingConstructs > >
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 12:06:36 UTC