Re: [SKOS] central issues

Hi Bernard,
>
> This is a good framework for questions I was about to post, which fit 
> at least in part in  [ISSUE-44]
> What are the relation of broader/narrower semantics with conceptScheme 
> semantics, if any?
>    * Should broader/narrower link concepts of the same concept scheme, 
> or are they allowed across concept schemes?

Does draft proposal I posted for mapping [1] bring an answer to your 
question? The idea would be expressing conceptual mapping across concept 
schemes trying to re-use the existing SKOS semantic relationships when 
possible ...

>    * If a concept belongs to several concept schemes, would it be 
> possible / does it make sense to distinguish broader-narrower 
> hierarchies in different schemes?

I think this is covered by ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment 
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36

> Related question, I would like to see specified the semantics of 
> ConceptScheme, and the difference between ConceptScheme and subclass 
> of Concept.
???

Cheers,

Antoine

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptualMapping/ProposalOne
>
> Bernard
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to suggest we focus some attention on several issues to do 
>> with the central stuff in SKOS, like the skos:Concept class, the SKOS 
>> labelling properties and the SKOS semantic relation properties.
>> This would help us to fill out some of the earlier parts of the SKOS 
>> Semantics wiki draft [1]. The wiki draft has only one section so far, 
>> on grouping constructs, and so looks a bit empty :) This would also 
>> help the discussion of other issues, such as the relationships 
>> between labels.
>>
>> There are three central issues in the tracker we could look at:
>>
>>  * [ISSUE-31] "BasicLexicalLabelSemantics" - defining the semantics 
>> of the three basic labelling properties, skos:prefLabel, 
>> skos:altLabel and skos:hiddenLabel
>>  * [ISSUE-44] "BroaderNarrowerSemantics" - defining the semantics of 
>> skos:broader and skos:narrower
>>  * [ISSUE-54] "ConceptSemantics" - defining the semantics of 
>> skos:Concept
>> Issue 31 is already open. Issues 44 and 54 need to be opened (I just 
>> raised 54).
>>
>> Of course we should also continue the very valuable discussion of 
>> other issues and work to our requirements document!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Alistair.
>>
>> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Semantics>
>> [ISSUE-31] <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/31>
>> [ISSUE-44] <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/44>
>> [ISSUE-54] <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/54>
>>
>> -- 
>> Alistair Miles
>> Research Associate
>> Science and Technology Facilities Council
>> Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
>> Harwell Science and Innovation Campus
>> Didcot
>> Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
>> United Kingdom
>> Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
>> Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
>> Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
>>
>>   
>

Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 11:52:00 UTC