- From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 10:10:01 +0100
- To: carlmattocks@checkmi.com
- CC: Alistair Miles <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
+1 on going for use-cases. But getting the extensions into the Guide would also be very nice because some of them I think will be often used in practical use-cases and now their status is a bit unclear. Cheers, Mark. Carl Mattocks wrote: > Al et: > > I welcome the focus on use-cases .. especially for a time-boxed effort. > The outcome could be quite revealing. > > carl > <quote who="Alistair Miles"> > >>Hi all, >> >>The SWBPD-WG has asked for a 3 month charter extension to finish off a >>couple of documents and draft a charter for subsequent activities, which >>would take us up to 31 April. Continued SKOS work will feature in >>subsequent activities, most likely as a recommendation track work item. >> >>So how could we best use the time to 31 April? >> >>One option is to plan a 3rd review and publish 3rd public working drafts >>of the SKOS Core Guide and SKOS Core Vocabulary Specification. If we did >>this, I'd suggest we don't aim to be too ambitious, but go for changes >>like the extensions appendix, for which we know there is an immediate >>demand. >> >>Note that the chairs have indicated that the current SKOS WDs are quite >>sufficient as input to recommendation track work, so there is no >>necessity for us to publish 3rd public working drafts. >> >>Another option is to begin drafting a use cases and requirements >>document. The fundamental requirements and use cases driving design of >>SKOS Core have until now been implicit, and I think it would help to >>focus design goals if we attempt to articulate them. This would also >>greatly help scoping of rec track work. OWL has a 'requirements and use >>cases' document [1], as does SPARQL [2] - I haven't read these yet but I >>plan to :) >> >>Speaking personally, I'd rather put my effort into a use cases and >>requirements document. I'm currently finishing off a masters course, and >>only have a limited amount of time to devote to SKOS over the next 3 >>months. >> >>Whatever we decide, we can of course continue to develop and discuss the >>SKOS Core proposals/issues list [3]. >> >>Cheers, >> >>Al. >> >>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/ >>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/ >>[3] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/proposals >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >>Alistair Miles >>Research Associate >>CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >>Building R1 Room 1.60 >>Fermi Avenue >>Chilton >>Didcot >>Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >>United Kingdom >>Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >>Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 >> >> >> >>-- >>Alistair Miles >>Research Associate >>CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >>Building R1 Room 1.60 >>Fermi Avenue >>Chilton >>Didcot >>Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >>United Kingdom >>Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >>Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 >> >> > > > -- Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 11:59:21 UTC