- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 13:00:43 +0100
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> Other extensions could also be interesting. While we could > debate which > things go in core vocab and which in other namespaces, it > might be more > fun to set that aside for now (while noting that SKOS is only > a Working > Draft at this stage, and could change), and explore possibilities > for such extensions. Was there something specific you had in > mind? Audio > I think could be very interesting, particularly for SKOS > concept that is > close to the electronic dictionary space, eg. lexical databases such > as Wordnet (although SWBPD WG isn't using SKOS for Wordnet currently). > Where a concept is lexicalised, we could point to sound clips, or > Speech Synth markup (eg. see > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-speech-synthesis-20040907/) > ...could have > interesting application to accessibility, voice/mobile and perhaps > language learning apps... I like the idea of 'audio labels' ... Can anyone describe a relatively concrete use case? Al.
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2005 18:27:16 UTC