- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:21:19 -0000
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> * Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> [2005-03-22 17:33-0000] > > > > > > > > Yep, I just checked FOAF, the resource identified by > > > > > > > > http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ > > > > > > > > is content negotiable - you can get both text/html and > > > application/rdf+xml representations. > > > > > > Am happy to change this based on SWBPD WG and TAG decisions. > > > > ... but this seems like a good idea to me (?) ... which is > why I started exploring doing something similar for SKOS > Core. I think (?) the idea of a 'namespace document' that > has multiple media type representations, where > application/rdf+xml is a minimum requirement, is a reasonable > solution for RDF vocabularies. > > Unless you use # in the namespace URI references, since # semantics > are content-type dependent. Or so I've heard... Oh yeah, that old chestnut. Bother.
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2005 18:21:51 UTC