- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:33:15 -0000
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> > > > Yep, I just checked FOAF, the resource identified by > > > > http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ > > > > is content negotiable - you can get both text/html and > application/rdf+xml representations. > > Am happy to change this based on SWBPD WG and TAG decisions. ... but this seems like a good idea to me (?) ... which is why I started exploring doing something similar for SKOS Core. I think (?) the idea of a 'namespace document' that has multiple media type representations, where application/rdf+xml is a minimum requirement, is a reasonable solution for RDF vocabularies. Al.
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2005 17:33:47 UTC