- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:33:56 -0000
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@sidar.org>
- Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> But I agree with Dan that having something useful there is a good > practice. And as he says, it is entirely orthogonal to the # > vs / debate. Yeah but, can I refer to some document that says: (1) If you use an HTTP URI of the form http://foo#bar to denote a conceptual resource then the resource denoted by the URI http://foo should accept HTTP GET requests and provide representations according to content-types x and y (but not z) that convey information I. (2) If you use an HTTP URI of the form http://foo/bar to denote a conceptual resource then the resource denoted by http://foo/bar should redirect HTTP GET requests to another resource that provides representations according to content-types x and y (but not z) that convey information I. ... ? If that's written somewhere (is it?), great, but if it's not then the 'Quick Guide to Publishing a Thesaurus on the Semantic Web' is defining (or at least extending) best practice recommendations, and I think somebody else ought to be doing that first. Cheers, Al. > > cheers > > Chaals > > -- > Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar > charles@sidar.org +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.org >
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 14:34:28 UTC