- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:32:26 -0500
- To: carlmattocks@checkmi.com, "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:07:15 -0500, Carl Mattocks <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> wrote: > > If http://...schema#term prevents a 404 being generated then we should > take a firm step forward and present it as best practice. Sure, but it doesn't. And getting an ad for web hosting, or other content that doesn't illuminate what the term means is about as useful as a 404 anyway. It's a social practice of putting something at the URI when you use a URI for a term. Which is of course tricky for people who don't have a web server to put things at, or not one that they can rely on. I guess that is just a phase the world is going through, and we can expect it to pass in a decade or so. But I agree with Dan that having something useful there is a good practice. And as he says, it is entirely orthogonal to the # vs / debate. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar charles@sidar.org +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.org
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2005 21:33:19 UTC