W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > June 2005

Re: SKOS REC track

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:16:29 +0100
Message-ID: <42C0265D.1070507@w3.org>
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org

Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:

>Hi all,
>Just to note that I've been informed that most US federal guidance requires that only W3C RECs (and approved specs from OASIS, ISO, etc.) should be used in production systems.  This obviously bears on the discussion of whether SKOS should become the basis for a REC track work item.
Presumably, since SKOS-based RDF/XML docs comply with XML, RDF,
Namespaces, RDFS/OWL, we're OK in that SKOs can be "used in
production systems". Is the question more to do with whether SKOS itself
can be named in calls for tender etc?

Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 16:16:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:45:20 UTC