- From: Mikael Nilsson <mini@nada.kth.se>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:38:22 +0200
- To: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- CC: public-esw-thes@w3.org
- Message-ID: <42C5717E.1080100@nada.kth.se>
Mark van Assem wrote: > Hi, > > Ah, you're right, there is a need for a superprop for extensions. > > Note that giving it the name "symbol" implies (to me) a more general > semantics than "symbolicLabel". In the former any symbol can be > attached to a concept, in the latter they should be some kind of label > for the concept. E.g. the former allows an arrow to be a symbol for > the concept "rock" (e.g. as an icon in an application), while the > latter only allows this if there is a specific "symbol vocabulary" > that uses an arrow as a symbol for "rock". What does the "prefLabel" name imply? It is important that these term share meaning.... Any argument against "label" is an argument against "prefLabel". And vice versa - any argument *for* "prefLabel" is an argument for "label". :-) /Mikael > > Your suggestion is more general so probably to be preferred above > symbolicLabel? > > Mark. > >> I have no specific use case for this, but I would like SKOS Core to >> follow the design pattern that all property families that share common >> semantics descend from a single super-property. I think it is >> important to capture common semantics, and is important from the point >> of view of extensions, where each property is in principle an >> extension (refinement) point. >> >> So 'skos:symbol' (I propose that name, instead of the longer >> 'skos:symbolicLabel') would be the symbol equivalent to rdfs:label. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Al. >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mark van Assem [mailto:mark@cs.vu.nl] >>> Sent: 01 July 2005 13:51 >>> To: Miles, AJ (Alistair) >>> Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org >>> Subject: Re: symbolic labels >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In general always a good idea to introduce a superprop, but what's >>> the use case here? Will implementers be wanting to show a >>> skos:symbolicLabel instead of just checking whether there is a >>> prefSymbol available? >>> >>> Mark. >>> >>> Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Following the design pattern for lexical labels, i.e. a >>> >>> >>> property hierarchy with a single root, e.g. ... >>> >>>> rdfs:label >>>> | >>>> +-- skos:prefLabel >>>> | >>>> +-- skos:altLabel >>>> | >>>> +-- skos:hiddenLabel >>>> >>>> ... oughtn't we have a single property at the root of the >>> >>> >>> symbolic labelling properties, e.g. ... >>> >>>> skos:symbolicLabel >>>> | >>>> +-- skos:prefSymbol >>>> | >>>> +-- skos:altSymbol >>>> >>>> ... ? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Al. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Alistair Miles >>>> Research Associate >>>> CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >>>> Building R1 Room 1.60 >>>> Fermi Avenue >>>> Chilton >>>> Didcot >>>> Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >>>> United Kingdom >>>> Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >>>> Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam >>> mark@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark >>> >> >> > -- Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 16:41:58 UTC