Re: SKOS public working drafts

I'm under the impression that DC is more stable than FOAF (am I
correct?). So if the DC class has the same meaning there's no reason
not to use it.

Mark.


Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Søren Roug [mailto:Soren.Roug@eea.eu.int]
>>Sent: 07 June 2005 15:11
>>To: Miles, AJ (Alistair)
>>Subject: RE: SKOS public working drafts
>>
>>I'm surprised the altSymbol has foaf:Image as range. The 
>>Image class in http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/ seems more 
>>appropiate. After all, Dublin Core elements are more likely 
>>to be known by thesauri developers than FOAF.
> 
> 
> I'd be willing to support this change, if other's agreed this was a good idea.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Al.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        mark@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark



-- 
  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        mark@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark

Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 16:27:41 UTC