RE: [PORT] Which is the right list to discuss SKOS now?

I usually do mails on design of SKOS to public-esw-thes@w3.org, unless there is an issue which has obvious overlap to other SWBP WGs, in which case I cc public-swbp-wg@w3.org.  Process issues I do to public-swbp-wg@w3.org, but often cc public-esw-thes@w3.org to keep folks only on that list in the loop.

(Btw for those only on public-esw-thes@w3.org, public-swbp-wg@w3.org is also public and anyone can subscribe :)

Cheers,

Al.

---
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Building R1 Room 1.60
Fermi Avenue
Chilton
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440



> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dan Brickley
> Sent: 24 February 2005 09:50
> To: Bernard Vatant
> Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org; public-swbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [PORT] Which is the right list to discuss SKOS now?
> 
> 
> 
> * Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> [2005-02-24 10:43+0100]
> > 
> > 
> > I've lately seen messages about SKOS being posted either on 
> public-swbp-wg@w3.org, or
> > public-esw-thes@w3.org, or both lists like this one. Since 
> SKOS in now on the SWBP table,
> > and on the W3C Recommendation track, I'm not sure what 
> should be the practice now.
> 
> I've tended to send detailed comments to public-esw-thes; and more 
> process or workflow or WG-specific things to the WG list. BTW 
> we're not 
> yet agreed we're on track to RECommendation. I'm not sure best way to 
> partition things between lists either fwiw... 
> 
> Dan
> 
> > 
> > Meanwhile I forward to SWBP two messages I posted lately to 
> public-esw-thes@w3.org only,
> > well aware that it is not a best practice :)
> > 
> > Bernard
> > 
> > 
> **************************************************************
> ********************
> > 
> > Bernard Vatant
> > Senior Consultant
> > Knowledge Engineering
> > bernard.vatant@mondeca.com
> > 
> > "Making Sense of Content" :  http://www.mondeca.com
> > "Everything is a Subject" :  http://universimmedia.blogspot.com
> > 
> > 
> **************************************************************
> ********************
> > 
> > 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 17:29:17 UTC