- From: Leonard Will <L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:56:10 +0000
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
In message <4219BB99.9020207@hp.com> on Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Ian Dickinson <ian.dickinson@hp.com> wrote > >I notice that skos:subject has a rdfs:domain of foaf:Document. >Apologies if this has been discussed before, but is there a reason for >this? I would have thought that resources other than documents (and >indeed, FOAF's particular take on what a document is) can be classified >by a SKOS concept. In the draft British Standard for thesaurus construction we have used "document" with a very broad meaning, equivalent to "information resource" - it is just more convenient to have one word rather than two.. That definition is given in <http://www.willpowerinfo.co.uk/glossary.htm>. Not all the terms in that glossary have been agreed by the BS working party, but "document" is unchanged from the current draft standard. Leonard Will -- Willpower Information (Partners: Dr Leonard D Will, Sheena E Will) Information Management Consultants Tel: +44 (0)20 8372 0092 27 Calshot Way, Enfield, Middlesex EN2 7BQ, UK. Fax: +44 (0)870 051 7276 L.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk Sheena.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk ---------------- <URL:http://www.willpowerinfo.co.uk/> -----------------
Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 11:02:10 UTC