- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:36:50 -0400
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: 'Dave Reynolds' <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
* Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> [2004-09-29 16:20+0100] > > What if the definition of 'skos:denotes' was something like ... > > 'The OWL Individual or Class that this concept corresponds to.' We could drop 'OWL' there, since this works for generic RDF/RDFS too. It puts a lot of work onto the word 'corresponds', but I could live with this. cheers, Dan
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 15:36:51 UTC