RE: search labels

Good idea, I'd say
Stella

*****************************************************
Stella Dextre Clarke
Information Consultant
Luke House, West Hendred, Wantage, Oxon, OX12 8RR, UK
Tel: 01235-833-298
Fax: 01235-863-298
SDClarke@LukeHouse.demon.co.uk
*****************************************************



-----Original Message-----
From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ron Davies
Sent: 15 October 2004 09:58
To: Miles, AJ (Alistair) ; 'public-esw-thes@w3.org'
Subject: Re: search labels


Al, 

These can indeed be very useful, for grammatical variations that not
handled in other ways, as well as for misspellings. The name of the
property might be a bit confusing however, as of course other kinds of
labels are also used in searching. As you say, the key defining factor
is that these alternative labels would not be displayed under normal
circumstances. So perhaps call it noDisplayLabel or hiddenLabel (or
something more elegant along those lines)?

Ron
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Davies
Information and documentation systems consultant
Av. Baden-Powell 1  Bte 2, 1200 Brussels, Belgium       
Email:  ron@rondavies.be
Tel:    +32 (0)2 770 33 51
GSM:    +32 (0)484 502 393

At 18:16 14/10/2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:



This is just a thought, but what about a property called e.g.
'searchLabel'
that allows you to add labels to a concept to aid user search, where you
*don't* want those labels to appear among the meaning-defining set of
labels
for that concept.  This could be used e.g. for common mis-spellings of
another label.

???

Al.   

---
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Building R1 Room 1.60
Fermi Avenue
Chilton
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440