- From: Ron Davies <ron@rondavies.be>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:57:50 +0200
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20041015105230.01cd7fa8@pop.skynet.be>
Al, These can indeed be very useful, for grammatical variations that not handled in other ways, as well as for misspellings. The name of the property might be a bit confusing however, as of course other kinds of labels are also used in searching. As you say, the key defining factor is that these alternative labels would not be displayed under normal circumstances. So perhaps call it noDisplayLabel or hiddenLabel (or something more elegant along those lines)? Ron -------------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Davies Information and documentation systems consultant Av. Baden-Powell 1 Bte 2, 1200 Brussels, Belgium Email: ron@rondavies.be Tel: +32 (0)2 770 33 51 GSM: +32 (0)484 502 393 At 18:16 14/10/2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: >This is just a thought, but what about a property called e.g. 'searchLabel' >that allows you to add labels to a concept to aid user search, where you >*don't* want those labels to appear among the meaning-defining set of labels >for that concept. This could be used e.g. for common mis-spellings of >another label. > >??? > >Al. > >--- >Alistair Miles >Research Associate >CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >Building R1 Room 1.60 >Fermi Avenue >Chilton >Didcot >Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >United Kingdom >Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 08:58:26 UTC