- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:37:30 +0100
- To: "'Houghton,Andrew'" <houghtoa@oclc.org>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi Andy, Yes, I was thinking that 'skos:searchLabel' would be a sub-property of rdfs:label. Al. --- Alistair Miles Research Associate CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Houghton,Andrew > Sent: 14 October 2004 18:20 > To: public-esw-thes@w3.org > Subject: RE: search labels > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stella Dextre Clarke [mailto:sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk] > > Sent: 14 October, 2004 13:00 > > Subject: RE: search labels > > > > > > Could be useful. Mis-spellings can be useful to assist search > > (provided they are common, unambiguous and distinctive, > > unlikely to be confused with another preferred term. See our > > draft BS8723 Part 2) and it is good to be able to keep them > > separate from normal non-preferred terms Stella > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, AJ > > (Alistair) > > Sent: 14 October 2004 17:17 > > To: 'public-esw-thes@w3.org' > > Subject: search labels > > > > This is just a thought, but what about a property called e.g. > > 'searchLabel' that allows you to add labels to a concept to aid user > > search, where you > > *don't* want those labels to appear among the > meaning-defining set of > > labels for that concept. This could be used e.g. for common > > mis-spellings of another label. > > > > I assume that if this proposal were to go forward that > skos:searchLabel > would become a sub-property of rdfs:label as is skos:prefLabel and > skos:altLabel. Would you want to distinguish between labels that > were part of the thesaurus proper or not? This might indicate another > abstract level like: > > rdfs:label > skos:inThesaurusLabel > skos:prefLabel > skos:altLabel > skos:nonThesaurusLabel > skos:searchLabel > > I used skos:inThesaurusLabel and skos:nonThesaurusLabel as abstract > types and am not suggesting these names. > > So the question in my mind is: would you want this level of > abstraction > or is making skos:searchLabel a sub-property of rdfs:label sufficient? > > > Andy. >
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:38:05 UTC