RE: search labels

Hi Andy,

Yes, I was thinking that 'skos:searchLabel' would be a sub-property of
rdfs:label.

Al.

---
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Building R1 Room 1.60
Fermi Avenue
Chilton
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440



> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Houghton,Andrew
> Sent: 14 October 2004 18:20
> To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
> Subject: RE: search labels
> 
> 
> 
>  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stella Dextre Clarke [mailto:sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk] 
> > Sent: 14 October, 2004 13:00
> > Subject: RE: search labels
> > 
> > 
> > Could be useful. Mis-spellings can be useful to assist search 
> > (provided they are common, unambiguous and distinctive, 
> > unlikely to be confused with another preferred term. See our 
> > draft BS8723 Part 2) and it is good to be able to keep them 
> > separate from normal non-preferred terms Stella
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, AJ
> > (Alistair)
> > Sent: 14 October 2004 17:17
> > To: 'public-esw-thes@w3.org'
> > Subject: search labels
> > 
> > This is just a thought, but what about a property called e.g.
> > 'searchLabel' that allows you to add labels to a concept to aid user
> > search, where you
> > *don't* want those labels to appear among the 
> meaning-defining set of
> > labels for that concept.  This could be used e.g. for common
> > mis-spellings of another label.
> > 
> 
> I assume that if this proposal were to go forward that 
> skos:searchLabel
> would become a sub-property of rdfs:label as is skos:prefLabel and 
> skos:altLabel.  Would you want to distinguish between labels that
> were part of the thesaurus proper or not?  This might indicate another
> abstract level like:
> 
> rdfs:label
>   skos:inThesaurusLabel
>     skos:prefLabel
>     skos:altLabel
>   skos:nonThesaurusLabel
>     skos:searchLabel
> 
> I used skos:inThesaurusLabel and skos:nonThesaurusLabel as abstract
> types and am not suggesting these names.
> 
> So the question in my mind is: would you want this level of 
> abstraction
> or is making skos:searchLabel a sub-property of rdfs:label sufficient?
> 
> 
> Andy.
>

Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:38:05 UTC