- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:31:08 -0000
- To: "'danny666@virgilio.it'" <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> Hi Alistair, folks, > > fyi, there's a 'vanilla' XML format for facetted > classification with the > obvious acronym XFML [1]. It's primarily aimed at web site > data (such as > blogs). The model/syntax is close to parts of Topic Maps/XTM, and > considers facets to be mutually exclusive categories, which may form > part of a hierarchical classification. > > I'm pointing to it now because there are some good refs on > facets around > that area [2], and I've a feeling facetting may be a very > powerful tool > in the SKOS kit. Also I'm wondering whether some of the data > that's been > marked up in XFML could be automatically translated into > SKOS/RDF. Hi Danny, thanks for the refs on this. It seems to me that data in XFML can go straight into RDF, using the constructs of RDFS (and a bit of OWL) only. E.g. I modelled the detergents example from [1] using RDFS - see: <http://www.w3c.rl.ac.uk/SWAD/rdf/facet_in_rdfs.txt>. This approach is also what the Siderean folks do [2] and what Nikki was suggesting this morning [3]. I.e. a 'facet' in the XFML sense can be modelled as a rdf:Property with a defined domain and range. At the moment I'm trying to manage SKOS so it doesn't duplicate anything that can already be modelled with RDFS or OWL - these three vocabularies ought to be complementary. Which is why I'm so keen to clear up the 'facet' issue. Maybe someone should sit down and write a white paper on how to do 'faceted classification' to support web catalogue browsing using RDF, RDFS and OWL (including some XSLT to generate RDF from XFML)??? Al. [1] http://www.miskatonic.org/library/facet-web-howto.html [2] http://www.siderean.com/TechnologyWhitePaper.pdf [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Mar/0070.html That > the format yields well to XSLT is demonstrated at [3] - view source. > > btw, XFML doesn't really have a mechanism for enforcing the mutual > exclusion, it's assumes the cataloguer will look after that. > > Note too that Siderean Software have done a fair amount of work with > facetted classification and RDF [4]. > > Cheers, > Danny. > > [1] http://xfml.org/ > [2] http://xfml.org/links.html > [3] http://www.alter.most.org.pl/fa/xfml/altermap.xml > [4] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/facetedclassification/message/199 >
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 09:31:42 UTC