- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:36:56 -0000
- To: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Doug wrote me a while ago to say that 'related' should not always be symmetric. So I made <skos:related> not symmetric, and created an extension <skos:relatedSymmetric> to account for the situations where 'related' can be taken as symmetric. But Leonard's last mail suggests that 'related' is most often symmetric. In this case would it be better to have <skos:related> as a symmetric property, and have an extension <skos:relatedAsymmetric> for those situations where 'related' is directional? [N.B. need to resolve this by wednesday!] Al. --- Alistair Miles Research Associate CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 06:38:08 UTC