- From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:35:13 +0100
- To: "NJ Rogers, Learning and Research Technology" <Nikki.Rogers@bristol.ac.uk>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 16:35:20 UTC
Hello > DREFT > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/thes/dreft/ > Does that help at all? thats what i needed! most important the CODE. btw: first there was nothing, then god came and spoke code.... I have this theory that ontologies are hot air until they are used in code somewhere. > This is an issue I would be keen to discuss further. In my previous > post I said: > > <snip> For example click on 'SKOSThesaurus' at > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/thes/api/docs/ in order to > view the interface for a SKOS service: the method summary lists what > we deem to be required methods - they are derived from our review of > use cases and subsequent implementation experience. For e.g: " > Concept[] getAllConceptRelatives(Concept concept) Get a list of > all concept relatives." </snip> That's similiar to what we do. so I am going to have an intense look at DREFT and perhaps we two can make this "inside api" for SKOS together, open source style. SF project? OpenSkos :-) cheers Leo
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 16:35:20 UTC