- From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 19:49:29 +0200
- To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@w3.org>, "'Bernard Vatant'" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: "'Miles, AJ (Alistair) '" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, <public-esw@w3.org>
I agree also to using http:// uris and / as delimiter. Yes, I used some wordnet terms and it seems they work Perhaps Patrick Stickler will also like it to use http:// and / to identify concepts, his URIQA should work with it. cheers Leo > * Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> [2004-04-30 17:36+0200] > > > > To go along with Dan ... > > > > I also prefer the / approach in principle because it defines more > > neatly the "subject indicator", but consider that e.g. OWL uses > > fragment identifiers to define classes and properties ... > > > > Will not people be confused with OWL elements defined by > > http://example.org/myontology#class001 > > and SKOS concepts defined by http://example.org/myskos/concept001 > > Some RDF/RDFS/OWL vocabs end in a / and others end in a # and > others do other things. This is the current state of affairs. > The confusion is only a problem because these different > approaches have different technical and standards > characteristics (and those aren't well explained, currently). > > > What about namespace management? > > An important but relatively independent problem, I think. > > > And having, e.g. for GEMET, over 8000 different > resources/concepts, if > > you just want to download the whole stuff, hmm... Is not it more > > simple to have a / namespace for a whole SKOS scheme, and # > for each > > concept in it? > > > > We've been through this in Published Subjects TC, without clear > > conclusion ... > > I've a few years experience using the > http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Cat etc approach, > and have to > say it is useful. The ability to return a useful chunk of > information from a larger dataset is something I am reluctant > to give up. Surely in the future we'll have richer (SKOS API, > RDF DAWG etc) interfaces to these datasets, but the current > approach can be implemented with a simple filetree or CGI > script, and has proved reasonably popular. > > Dan >
Received on Friday, 30 April 2004 13:50:08 UTC