- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:48:37 +0100
- To: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, "'public-esw@w3.org'" <public-esw@w3.org>
Hi all, I wanted to consult you all on this matter. I have agreement from the EEA to publish the GEMET environmental thesaurus in the SKOS/RDF format. The next step is to work out with them the URIs they wish to assign to their thesaurus and concepts. I'm not sure what to recommend to them on this matter. I thought to use an http:// based URI base (e.g. http://www.eionet.eu.int/GEMET) and then add the id number of each concept (e.g. http://www.eionet.eu.int/GEMET#204). A first question is, is it OK to use http: URIs for concepts? Sorry to drag this old chestnut up again, but I need some clear answer on best practices for this. Are we not at all concerned that the same URI may identify both a thesaurus concept and a resolveable network resource (i.e. the file containing the RDF data)? What do you think of info: based URIs for concepts? Hope to hear from you on this, Al. --- Alistair Miles Research Associate CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Monday, 19 April 2004 13:49:28 UTC