- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:10:59 -0000
- To: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Cheers Dave. -----Original Message----- From: Dave Reynolds [mailto:der@hplb.hpl.hp.com] Sent: 17 November 2003 15:52 To: Miles, AJ (Alistair) Subject: Re: NEW issue 6 - defining semantic relationships This seems amenable to subProperty relationships. You could have a base property "thesaurusRelationship", subProperties for broader/narrower, subProperties of those for specific usages like strict isa, partof etc. In that way some could use a strict partOf relation and a thesaurus tool that only understood BT would be able to treat it as a broaderTerm. Dave Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > I've added this issue to the RDF Thesaurus ESW Wiki. > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfThesaurus?action=show > > Short summary: > > Issue 6 - Defining semantic relationships > > Description: A thesaurus consists of concepts, labels for concepts, and > semantic relationships between concepts. A semantic relationship is a > relationship of meaning. Most thesauri use a similar set of semantic > relationships, which they label 'broader' 'narrower' and 'related'. > > Problem 1: 'broader/narrower' means different things in different thesauri. > In some thesauri it means strictly class-subsumption. In other thesauri it > can mean either is-a, instance-of, or part-of. Also 'related' is not > consistently used. For example some thesauri model part-of relations with > 'related', others use 'broader/narrower' > > => We must invent some mechanism for providing clear definitions of semantic > relationships, and for removing any scope for ambiguity. > > Problem 2: some thesauri have semantic relations other than > 'broader/narrower' and 'related'. Some overcome the 'broader/narrower' > fuzziness by using 'BTI', 'BTG' and 'BTP', which stand for > 'broader-term-instantive' 'broader-term-generic' and > 'broader-term-partitive' respectively. In others there are custom > relationships like 'related-broader'. > > => We must provide some mechanism by which users can extend the given > relationship set and define their own semantic relations. > > ..... > > > Alistair Miles > > CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > Building R1 Room 1.60 > Fermi Avenue > Chilton > Didcot > Oxfordshire OX11 0QX > United Kingdom > > Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk > Telephone: +44 (0)1235 445440 > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 08:11:04 UTC