Re: Call for Consensus: Publishing EPUB 3.2 as a Final Community Group Report

-1

I feel sorry to vote no, especially because I failed to
attend the last teleconf.  I planned to argue against but
I could not wake up at 01:00 AM.

I have nothing against the process and quality of EPUB 3.2.
It is by far the best in the EPUB 3 family.

But I remember that Apple ignored reserved prefixed introduced
as part of EPUB 3.0.1.  They have a reason.  By soliciting
testimonials from key players in this are, I would like to
avoid such an unfortunate situation.  Providing testimonials
is a strong yes vote.

But what happens if such key players find some issues
when we ask them to provide testimonials?  Will we say
"No, we won't fix them.  Too late."?  I would like to postpone
the completion of EPUB 3.2 until we contact key players
and get their testimonials.

Regards,
Makoto

2018年9月28日(金) 6:41 Kennedy, Naomi E <nkennedy@penguinrandomhouse.com>:

> +1
>
> On 9/27/18, 1:31 PM, "Dave Cramer" <dauwhe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi Everyone,
>
>     During our call today, the CG decided to recommend publishing EPUB 3.2
>     as a final community group report.
>
>     This is a 72-hour-ish call for consensus: If you support the final
>     publication of EPUB 3.2, please respond affirmatively to this email in
>     the next 72 hours. A "+1" will suffice if you don't feel wordy. Please
>     reply even if you were on the call today.
>
>     If you are opposed to the final publication, please let us know, and
>     preferably with much more than a "-1".
>
>     Please respond by Midnight UTC on Monday, October 1, which is
>
>     5:00PM PDT Monday (San Francisco)
>     8:00PM EDT Monday (New York)
>     2:00AM CEST Tuesday (Paris)
>     1:00AM BST Tuesday (London)
>     8:00AM JST Tuesday (Tokyo)
>     4:30AM IST Tuesday  (Chennai)
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     Dave Cramer
>     co-chair
>
>
>
>

-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto