Re: EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments

Oh, I would like to participate but I see everything is already taken?
I already worked out some typos and styling in the past, so I would love to
contribute over here as well.

2018-09-05 18:53 GMT+02:00 James Briano <jamesbriano@gmail.com>:

> I can help with spelling, grammar, and link-checking, if you needed.
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:11 PM Rachel Comerford <
> rachel.comerford@macmillan.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks John!
>>
>> Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility
>> | T 212.576.9433
>>
>> *Macmillan Learning*
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:31 PM, John B. Costa <jbcosta@repubit.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Rachel:
>>>
>>> EPUB3.2 Changes Tab:
>>>
>>>    - 5.0-5.3 look good.  No typo’s, grammatical, or language issues.
>>>    Links all resolve to the correct docs or location within 3.2.
>>>    - I am working on 6.0-6.9 this evening.  Should be finished by
>>>    tomorrow morning EDT.
>>>
>>>
>>> *John B. Costa  *CEO - RePubIT, LLC | Chair: IEEE ADB Committee
>>> Sanford FL 32771 USA   +1 321 262-3626
>>> jbcosta@repubit.com  |  www.linkedin.com/in/johnbcosta1
>>>
>>> *Natural Talents Applied Well*
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com>
>>> Date: Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 12:51 PM
>>> To: W3C EPUB 3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
>>> Subject: EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments
>>> Resent-From: <public-epub3@w3.org>
>>> Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:52:26 +0000
>>>
>>> In order to increase the likelihood that our specs have received
>>> sufficient review, we are reviving an editorial review practice initiated
>>> with 3.1. In this google spreadsheet
>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNertJpdYNZ0WWq758/edit#gid=483122108>
>>> is a list of assignees and the sections we would like them to review. We
>>> have to keep the sections reasonable. Please review your section by end of
>>> day September 7th. If you are unable to review your section, please notify
>>> me immediately so I can reassign your sections.
>>>
>>>
>>> To perform your review, please read the listed sections carefully,
>>> looking for any issues, such as clarity in language and consistency. You do
>>> not have to be a subject matter expert in the area that you are reviewing.
>>> If you find any problems, please report them using github, or use the
>>> mailing list if that would be more appropriate. Once you have completed
>>> your review, whether you have found errors or not, please email me directly
>>> so I can note the section has been covered. When reviewing a section, you
>>> may stop when a new section not on your list starts.
>>>
>>> Here again is a link to the assignments. I will also be emailing
>>> participants separately to notify them of assignments:
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNer
>>> tJpdYNZ0WWq758/edit#gid=483122108
>>>
>>> If you do not have an assignment and would like to contribute, please
>>> let me know!!
>>> Rachel and Dave
>>>
>>> Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and
>>> Accessibility | T 212.576.9433
>>>
>>> *Macmillan Learning*
>>>
>>
>>