W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-epub3@w3.org > September 2018

Re: EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments

From: James Briano <jamesbriano@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:53:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKFUdaiH45btVfBKY4w9yh2tEY5bLjHLqawrH24o56kgZThpvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: rachel.comerford@macmillan.com
Cc: jbcosta@repubit.com, W3C EPUB3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
I can help with spelling, grammar, and link-checking, if you needed.

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:11 PM Rachel Comerford <
rachel.comerford@macmillan.com> wrote:

> Thanks John!
>
> Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility
> | T 212.576.9433
>
> *Macmillan Learning*
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:31 PM, John B. Costa <jbcosta@repubit.com> wrote:
>
>> Rachel:
>>
>> EPUB3.2 Changes Tab:
>>
>>    - 5.0-5.3 look good.  No typo’s, grammatical, or language issues.
>>    Links all resolve to the correct docs or location within 3.2.
>>    - I am working on 6.0-6.9 this evening.  Should be finished by
>>    tomorrow morning EDT.
>>
>>
>> *John B. Costa  *CEO - RePubIT, LLC | Chair: IEEE ADB Committee
>> Sanford FL 32771 USA   +1 321 262-3626
>> jbcosta@repubit.com  |  www.linkedin.com/in/johnbcosta1
>>
>> *Natural Talents Applied Well*
>>
>>
>> From: Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com>
>> Date: Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 12:51 PM
>> To: W3C EPUB 3 Community Group <public-epub3@w3.org>
>> Subject: EPUB 3.2 Editorial Assignments
>> Resent-From: <public-epub3@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:52:26 +0000
>>
>> In order to increase the likelihood that our specs have received
>> sufficient review, we are reviving an editorial review practice initiated
>> with 3.1. In this google spreadsheet
>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNertJpdYNZ0WWq758/edit#gid=483122108>
>> is a list of assignees and the sections we would like them to review. We
>> have to keep the sections reasonable. Please review your section by end of
>> day September 7th. If you are unable to review your section, please notify
>> me immediately so I can reassign your sections.
>>
>>
>> To perform your review, please read the listed sections carefully,
>> looking for any issues, such as clarity in language and consistency. You do
>> not have to be a subject matter expert in the area that you are reviewing.
>> If you find any problems, please report them using github, or use the
>> mailing list if that would be more appropriate. Once you have completed
>> your review, whether you have found errors or not, please email me directly
>> so I can note the section has been covered. When reviewing a section, you
>> may stop when a new section not on your list starts.
>>
>> Here again is a link to the assignments. I will also be emailing
>> participants separately to notify them of assignments:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TDcBudM9UTm41PxFAX3UqGlvcqNertJpdYNZ0WWq758/edit#gid=483122108
>>
>> If you do not have an assignment and would like to contribute, please let
>> me know!!
>> Rachel and Dave
>>
>> Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility
>> | T 212.576.9433
>>
>> *Macmillan Learning*
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2018 17:03:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:41 UTC